<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Risk Management on 🦉 olshansky 🦁</title><link>https://olshansky.info/tags/risk-management/</link><description>Recent content in Risk Management on 🦉 olshansky 🦁</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 09:44:46 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://olshansky.info/tags/risk-management/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Q Day is closer than you think</title><link>https://olshansky.info/thoughts/2026-04-09-q-day-is-closer-than-you-think/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 09:44:46 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://olshansky.info/thoughts/2026-04-09-q-day-is-closer-than-you-think/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the single best perspective on the shift and risk in quantum computing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It has the perfect balance of technical detail, background, skepticism, realism, and, most importantly, risk tradeoffs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This quote captures it all:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The job is not to be skeptical of things we&amp;rsquo;re not experts in. The job is to mitigate credible threats, and there are credible experts telling us about an imminent threat.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In summary, it might be that in 10 years the predictions will turn out to be wrong, but at this point they might also be right soon, and that risk is now unacceptable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>